I joked about 2016 being the quintessential year
from hell but let's be realistic - it wasn't. It was just another year in
which - as usual - millions of humans died, many of them horribly and many
while still very young.
It also happened to be a
year in which a few more celebrities than usual shuffled off their
mortal coil - and in which the amplification of their deaths was perhaps a
useful diversion from some momentous political and ecological developments.
Of the celebrities who died in
2016 - a fair proportion of them were in their 80s and 90s so their deaths are
hardly unexpected or tragic, and some of them were younger people, a number of whom who had lived in ways that may not have been conducive to
longevity. So where was the
tragedy?
In the past people created myths
and legends about both the living and the dead - often as a comfort against the
harsh realities of their own lives and the awareness of their own
impermanence. We still do - we
just use digital media to do it these days instead of folk stories.
Myths and legends about the
great, the good, the bad, the beautiful and the ugly have also been used as
tools of social control. A lot of our modern myths are the product of the many
publicists and spin doctors employed by those who have a vested interest in
promoting certain aspects of a deceased person's character and life - to divert
the masses or, more prosaically, to sell stuff.
These days, thanks to digital
media, we're more immediately aware of the lives and the deaths of celebrities
and are bombarded with words and images mourning their passing and eulogising
them to, and sometimes beyond the point of commonsense and reason. Great dollops of faux sentiment
and schmaltz fly off the screen, blurring the real world which continues in all
its usual awfulness.
Of course it's sad when people
who have touched our lives die, but these are people most of us have absolutely
no connection with and never will, whose true personalities and worth we can
never really know and who, through film and recordings, actually remain as
'alive' to us plebeians as they ever were.
The celebrities who attract this
sort of media attention when they die are usually very rich. Their personal
losses, trials and tribulations, their battles with addiction or illness - were
all buffered by fame and by great wealth which enabled them to buy the very best of everything - from
legal representation to medical care. They were all cushioned by the downy
pillow of privilege - not an abstract political construct but real advantages and immunities.
I can't say I thought overly much
about George Michael - either as a singer or as a person. He wasn't a great musician but he was a
talented pop singer and I'm prepared to believe that he had a good heart. However, the acts of generosity he was
lauded for after his death have to be put into the perspective of his massive
fortune and his on-going earning capacity from royalties. For someone who is worth £100m to
donate £15k to someone - is -
objectively speaking - no more remarkable an act of generosity than a pensioner
giving £1 to a homeless person.
I can't say I gave much thought
to Carrie Fisher either. I have
never seen any Star Wars films -
although I could think I have given the ubiquity that was created
by the cynical mass marketing of Stars Wars' ephemera - but I did like her in
the Blues Brothers. I have also never read any of her books, but she seemed like a refreshingly
honest person especially when judged by the standards of the plastic world she lived in, in which honesty is notable more for
its absence than presence.
David Bowie - who I didn't like
as a musician and who I never forgave for his flirtation with fascism - died
younger than someone of his wealth might be expected to, but that was not 'stop
the world I want to get off' level tragedy. He'd abused his body when he was young, he had lived his
life to the full and died a rich, happy and fulfilled person, or so we are told.
I loved Leonard Cohen as an
artist and I felt very sad at his death but I know that he would be the first
to acknowledge how privileged a life he had led and I suspect he would have
approached the amplified mourning of his death at the age of 82 with his usual
laconic humour.
I lost my younger brother in
August to liver failure. He was Carrie Fisher's age. I also lost two other
close family members and, towards the end of the year, the husband of a good
friend died. He was the same age as my husband.
I've watched my once highly intelligent
and fiercely independent mother sink into a half life of immobility,
incontinence, confusion and periods of terror when the reality of her situation
breaks through the drug-induced fog in which her carers keep her.
I'm aware that 2016 - like all
other years - saw the deaths of millions of children under 5, most of whom need
not have died. Millions of others have lives full of misery, fear and
deprivation.
I'm aware that much about our
first world way of life is polluting, wasteful, cruel and asocial and looks
likely to become more so.
I'm aware that we have not slowed
our insane dash towards mass extinctions of other species, and I'm also aware
that we're on a slide to what may literally be the war to end all wars.
In this context I'm sorry, but
the deaths of a few famous and highly privileged people - however delightful,
talented, good, kind and generous we believe those people to be – really do
need to be put into a broader perspective.
No comments:
Post a Comment